Optimization Student Learning Outcomes Through Hyflex Learning Based On Student Engagement
https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.asci4134
Viewed = 0 time(s)
Abstract
Student engagement is an important factor in determining learning outcomes, but in online learning in particular, many obstacles are still faced. On the other hand, studies on the implementation of effective online learning are still limited. This study aims to: 1) produce an empirical mapping of the implementation of online learning based on student engagement and its impact on their learning outcomes, 2) describe the characteristics of HyFlex learning based on student engagement and 3) describe respondents' opinions about student engagement in HyFlex learning. The research instruments used were observation sheets, document recording sheets, questionnaires and interview guides. Data were analyzed using a meta-analysis method by calculating the effect size of selected articles, complemented by qualitative descriptive analysis. The results of the study are: 1) student engagement is significantly positively correlated with student learning outcomes, indicating a strong influence in the high category. 2) identification of valid HyFlex learning characteristics based on student engagement to optimize their learning outcomes, and 3) respondents' opinions about student engagement in HyFlex learning are very positive, with an average of 73% good responses in both synchronous and asynchronous modes. Future researchers can further develop and apply the HyFlex Model in different environments.
Downloads
References
Beatty, B. (2019). Hybrid-Flexible Course Design (1st ed.). EdTech Books. https://doi.org/10.59668/33
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
Caparas, S. M. L., & Yango, A. R. (2023). Digital Divide, Digital Equity, and Online Learning Engagement Among Selected College Students in Pamantasan ng Cabuyao. Technium: Social Science Journal, 44(1), 206–219.
Chen, L.-L. (2022). Designing Online Discussion for HyFlex Learning. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(1), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.8.1.191
Chiu, T. K. F. (2022). Applying the self-determination theory (SDT) to explain student engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(sup1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1891998
Chung, E., Subramaniam, G., & Christ Dass, L. (2020). Online Learning Readiness Among University Students in Malaysia Amidst Covid-19. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(2), 45. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i2.10294
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed). Routledge.
Detyna, M., & Koch, M. (2023). An Overview of Student Perceptions of Hybrid Flexible Learning at a London HEI. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2023(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.784
Hartnett, M. (2016). Motivation in Online Education. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0700-2
Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S., & Bélisle, M. (2021). An examination of teachers’ strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3
Kusuma, A. S., Parwati, N. N., Tegeh, I. M., & Sudarma, I. K. (2024). Project-Based Learning Assisted With E- Module Based Tri Hita Karana: Improving Students Critical Thinking and Social Behaviors in Isad. Synesis, 16(1), 267–282.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Rohidi, T. R. (1992). Analisis data kualitatif: Buku sumber tentang metode-metode baru. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=50--swEACAAJ
Ms, G. D. T., Ni Nyoman, P., Warpala, I. W. S., Sudatha, I. G. W., Sudarmika, P., & Suartama, I. K. (2022). The impact of project based E-learning on cognitive and psychomotor learning achievement in sports massage course. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(12), 4393–4408. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i12.7913
Paas, F., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2020). Cognitive-Load Theory: Methods to Manage Working Memory Load in the Learning of Complex Tasks. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(4), 394–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420922183
Parwati, N. N., & Suharta, I. G. P. (2020). Effectiveness of the Implementation of Cognitive Conflict Strategy Assisted by e-Service Learning to Reduce Students’ Mathematical Misconceptions. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(11), 102. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i11.11802
Patricia Aguilera-Hermida, A. (2020). College students’ use and acceptance of emergency online learning due to COVID-19. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 100011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100011
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, Dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia Nomor 53 Tahun 2023 Tentang Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan Tinggi, Pub. L. No. 53 (2023).
Sarfraz, M., Hussain, G., Shahid, M., Riaz, A., Muavia, M., Fahed, Y. S., Azam, F., & Abdullah, M. T. (2022). Medical Students’ Online Learning Perceptions, Online Learning Readiness, and Learning Outcomes during COVID-19: The Moderating Role of Teacher’s Readiness to Teach Online. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 3520. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063520
Zen, Z., Reflianto, Syamsuar, & Ariani, F. (2022). Academic achievement: The effect of project-based online learning method and student engagement. Heliyon, 8(11), e11509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11509
Copyright (c) 2025 Ni Nyoman Parwati, I Gusti Putu Suharta, I Gde Wawan Sudatha, Putu Buddhi Prameswara, Siti Hajar Halili (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
