The Use of Asynchronous Google Classroom with Video Teaching Tutorial on Improving Student Writing Achievement for Recount Text at Public Senior High School 6 Kendari
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.asci884Keywords:
Asynchronous google classroom, Online learning, VTT, Writing skill, Recount Text, EFL, Blended LearningAbstract
This study aims to investigate how effective asynchronous Google classroom with VTT on improving students' writing achievement for recount text at SMAN 6 Kendari used quantitative design with pre-experimental one group pre-test and post-test. The research population was 346 entire school who registered in academic year 2020/2021. Meanwhile, XI MIPA 3 were 28 students as a valid sample of this study. Sampling selected using simple cluster random. Data collection used a written test that analyst by paired sample t-test that shows descriptive and inferential statistics based on students pre-and post-test. The research finding shows that there was significant different in gain score for pre-test (M=62,50; SD= 5.853) and Post-test (M=80.1071; SD=5.09422), t (27) = 13.095; p < 0.05, ttable= 2.052. It shows t-count > t-table with sig ? < 0.05, H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted, so it can be concluded that using asynchronous google classroom with video teaching tutorial show a positive effect on student writing achievement for recount text at SMAN 6 Kendari.
Downloads
References
Ebener, Sarah, "Using Google tools to enhance secondary writing instruction" (2017). Graduate Research Papers. 135. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/grp/135
Er, E., Özden, M., & Arifoglu, A. (2009). A blended e-learning environment: A model proposition for integration of asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. International Journal of Learning, 16(2), pp. 449-460.
E-Learners.com (2012, April 2). Synchronous vs. asynchronous classes [blog]. Retrieved from http://www.elearners.com/online-education-resources/online-learning/synchronous-vs-asynchronous-classes/
Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), pp. 393-416. Retrieved from http://learnonline.canberra.edu.au/file.php/5963/TPACK_UC/pdf/harris_mishra_koehler_jrte.pdf
Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous & synchronous e-learning. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 31(4), pp. 51-55. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eqm0848.pdf
Jacobs, H. L., Stephen, D., V., & Faye, J. (1981). Testing ESL Composition Profile: A Practical Approach. London; Tokyo: Newbury House Publisher.
Keeler, A., & Miller, L. (2015). 50 Things You Can Do With Google Classroom. Sandiego, CA: Dave Burgess Consulting, Inc.
Meloni, J. (2010, January 11). Tools for synchronous and asynchronous classroom discussion [online blog]. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/blogs/profhacker/tools-for-synchronousasynchronous-classroom-discussion/22902
Shaharanee, I. N. M., Jamil, J. M., & Rodzi, S. S. M. (2016). Google classroom as a tool for active learning. 020069. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4960909
Siagian, S. P. (1995). Teori Motivasi dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2012). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education. (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Skylar, A. (2009). A Comparison of asynchronous online text-based lectures and synchronous interactive web conferencing lectures. Issues in Teacher Education, 18(2), pp. 69-84. Retrieved from http://proxy1.ncu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ858506&site=eds-live
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
