OriginalPaper | Open access | Published: June 19, 2020

Analysis of Learning Styles of Students in Class of XI Science 1 and XI Science 2 at SMAN 3 North Luwu

Jesi Jecsen Pongkendek, Dewi Satria Ahmar
Journal of Applied Science, Engineering, Technology, and Education, Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020), pp. 28-31 https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.asci2152 Published: 2020-06-19
Get Permissions

Abstract

The study was a descriptive study with the aim of knowing the description of the learning styles of students of Class of XI Science 1 and XI Science 2 of SMAN 3 North Luwu. Description of learning styles that will be obtained in the form of visual style, auditory, and kinesthetic. The subjects of this study were students of class of XI Science 1 totaling 29 students and XI Science 2 totaling 30 students. Retrieval of research data is done by using a student learning style questionnaire. Through descriptive data analysis process results obtained show that (a) the tendency of learning styles of the class of XI Science 1 student: 18 students as visual (62.1%), 4 students as auditory (13.8%), and 7 students as kinesthetic ( 24.1 %%); (b) the tendency of students' learning styles in class of XI Science 2: visual are 15 students (50%), auditory are 9 students (30%), and kinesthetic are 6 students (20%). Through this research, it can be seen that the learning styles of students are different, some tend to be visual, auditory, or kinesthetic. Although it appears that the tendency of learning styles of students in Class of XI Science 1 and XI Science 2 is a visual style. Thus, the teacher can determine the right learning design to be implemented in the classroom.

Keywords

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References (15)

  1. F. Ahmad and N. I. Sari, “Improvement of Biology Learning Results Through the Application of Problem-Based Instruction Approach Oriented Think Pair Share Learning Model,” J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, Jun. 2019. doi: 10.35877/454RI.asci1149
  2. A. A. Win, “The Effectiveness of Using Multiple Intelligences Learning Models on Biology Learning Outcomes of Class VII Students in Madani Junior High School of Makassar,” J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, Oct. 2019. doi: 10.35877/454RI.asci1150
  3. A. A. Rahma and H. Arista, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Resicrocal Teaching Berbantuan LKS terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa,” Musamus J. Sci. Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 53–59, 2019.
  4. Patimah and F. Abdullah, “Pengaruh Penerapan Gaya Belajar Terhadap Kemampuan Membaca Intensif pada Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Siswa SD Negeri Sunyaragi 1 Kota Cirebon,” Al Ibtida J. Pendidik. Guru MI, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 133, 2018.
  5. A. Ghofur, D. Nafisah, and N. Eryadini, “Gaya Belajar dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kemampuan Berfikir Kritis Mahasiswa,” J. An-Nafs Kaji. Penelit. Psikol., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 166–184, 2016.
  6. F. Anisa and E. Yuliyanto, “Analisis Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pembelajaran Kimia di SMA Teuku Umar Semarang,” in Jurnal prosiding seminar nasional pendidikan, sains, dan teknologi, 2017, pp. 476–482.
  7. E. Ristiyani and E. S. Bahriah, “Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Kimia Siswa di SMAN X Kota Tangerang Selatan,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 18–29, 2016.
  8. J. J. Pongkendek, J. Parlindungan, and N. Sumanik, “The Development of Direct Learning Strategies in Topic Solubility and Solubility Product,” in ICSS, 2019, vol. 383, pp. 129–133.
  9. J. J. Pongkendek, D. N. Marpaung, and L. F. Siregar, “Analisis Motivasi Belajar Siswa Dengan Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Team Games Tournament,” Musamus J. Sci. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 31–38, 2019.
  10. I. Inayanti, T. Subroto, and K. I. Supardi, “Pembelajaran Visualisasi, Auditori, Kinestetik Menggunakan Media Swishmax Materi Larutan Elektrolit Dan Non-Elektrolit,” Chem. Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 35–41, 2012.

How to Cite

Pongkendek, J. J., & Ahmar, D. S. (2020). Analysis of Learning Styles of Students in Class of XI Science 1 and XI Science 2 at SMAN 3 North Luwu . Journal of Applied Science, Engineering, Technology, and Education, 2(1), 28–31. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.asci2152