Exploratory Factor Analysis of the Malaysian Geography Teachers’ Professionalism Questionnaire Instrument

Mohammad Azri Bin Amatan, Hanifah Mahat, Yazid Saleh, Mazdi Marzuki, Fauziah Che Leh
https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.asci4801

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and validate the Malaysian Geography Teachers’ Professionalism Questionnaire Instrument based on the 2027 School Curriculum Framework. The instrument was designed to measure four key dimensions of geography teachers’ professionalism: pedagogical practice, content mastery, assessment implementation, and character education. A quantitative survey design was employed involving 300 secondary school geography teachers in Malaysia. Respondents were selected using proportional stratified sampling and simple random sampling. The questionnaire consisted of 60 items, with 15 items representing each construct. Content validity was established through expert review, while construct validity was examined using exploratory factor analysis. The results indicated that the data were suitable for factor analysis, with a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value of .937 and a significant Bartlett’s test of sphericity. Four factors were extracted, explaining 49.161% of the total variance. Most items recorded acceptable factor loadings ranging from .342 to .807, supporting the construct validity of the instrument. Overall, the study produced a valid instrument for measuring geography teachers’ professionalism in the Malaysian secondary school context and provides a useful tool for researchers, policymakers, and educational stakeholders.

Keywords

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References (43)

  1. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
  2. Bartlett, M. S. (1954). A note on the multiplying factors for various chi-square approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 16(2), 296–298.
  3. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.
  4. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807
  5. Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868
  6. Cowie, P. M. (1978). Geography: A value laden subject in education. Geographical Education, 3, 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221347808980118
  7. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  8. DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  9. Ghani, M. F. A., & Adnan, A. K. (2015a). Malaysian teaching professional development model: Need analysis study in high? and low?performing schools. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 2(2), 32–46.
  10. Ghani, M. F. A., & Adnan, A. K. (2015b). Malaysian teaching professional development model: Need analysis study in high and low performing schools. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 2(2), 32–46.

How to Cite

Amatan, M. A. B., Mahat, H., Saleh, Y., Marzuki, M., & Leh, F. C. (2026). Exploratory Factor Analysis of the Malaysian Geography Teachers’ Professionalism Questionnaire Instrument. Journal of Applied Science, Engineering, Technology, and Education, 8(2), 414–430. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.asci4801

Copyright & license

Copyright (c) 2026 Mohammad Azri Bin Amatan (Author)