What Drives Variation Order Impact on Project Performance? PLS-SEM Evidence from Omani Fishery Port ProjectsT

The impact of Varetion Order

Masoud ALQassabi, Shuhairy Norhisham, Mohammed Zakwan, Azan AL-Shukaili, Rashid AlKhawaldi
https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.asci4793

Abstract

Variation orders (VOs) represent a persistent source of cost overruns, schedule delays, and stakeholder disputes in construction projects worldwide, yet their differential impact on performance across heterogeneous causal categories remains insufficiently understood, particularly in specialised marine infrastructure contexts. This study investigates the causes and project performance consequences of variation orders in Omani fishery port construction projects using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). Seven theoretically grounded VO cause categories, contractor-related (CON), client-related (CR), consultant-related (CS), environmental-related (ER), innovation-related (IR), organizational-related (OR), and resource-related (RR), were modeled as independent predictors of project performance (PP), operationalised across cost, time, quality, and stakeholder satisfaction dimensions. Survey data were collected from 113 construction professionals with direct fishery port project experience in Oman, encompassing government client agencies, engineering consultancies, and contracting organisations. The structural model results reveal that contractor-related causes (? = 0.549, p = 0.006, f² = 0.547) and client-related causes (? = 0.281, p = 0.021, f² = 0.280) are the only statistically significant direct predictors of project performance, collectively demonstrating that VO impacts are concentrated in execution capability and client governance rather than distributed evenly across causal domains. The remaining five constructs did not attain direct significance, suggesting their performance effects operate through mediated pathways via contractor execution and client decision-making mechanisms. These findings contribute an integrated, context-sensitive structural model of VO impact to the construction management literature and offer targeted governance recommendations for procuring authorities, engineering consultants, and contracting firms operating within Oman's marine infrastructure program.

Keywords

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References (33)

  1. Adu, M. E., Ekung, S. B., & Adeniran, L. (2020). Key causes of variation orders in public construction projects in South-South Nigeria: An explanatory factor analysis. Civil and Environmental Research, 12(1), 47–59.
  2. Al Maamari, A. S. M., & Khan, F. R. (2021). Evaluating the causes and impacts of change orders on construction project performance in Oman. International Journal of Research in Entrepreneurship & Business Studies, 2(1), 41–50.
  3. Alnuaimi, A. S., Taha, R. A., Al Mohsin, M., & Al-Harthi, A. S. (2010). Causes, effects, benefits, and remedies of change orders on public construction projects in Oman. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(5), 615–622.
  4. AlRubaiei, Q. A. H., Nifa, F. A. A., Chong, K. L., & Rahim, A. H. A. (2022). A review of scope management in public construction projects in Oman. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2644(1), 020012.
  5. Alsulami, B. (2024). Quantifying the impact of change orders on construction project performance in Saudi Arabia. Buildings, 14(3), 587.
  6. Alsohiman, N. K., Wael, A., & Husnain, H. (2023). Ranking of variation orders caused by the owners of construction projects in Saudi Arabia using statistical and fuzzy-based methods. CivilEng, 4(4), 661–681.
  7. Amzafi, N. H., Ishak, S. A., Rahim, A., Amlus, M. H., Rani, H. A., Syammaun, T., Mokhtar, H., & Ayob, A. (2024). A systematic review of the causes and effects of variation orders in sustainable construction in developing countries. International Journal of Integrated Engineering, 16(4), 188–203.
  8. Arain, F. M., & Pheng, L. S. (2007). Modeling for management of variations in building projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 14(5), 420–433.
  9. Cabalag, M. V., & Silva, D. L. (2019). Variation prognostic model on port infrastructures: Employment of principal component analysis for factor extraction instigating disparity on planning and implementation phase. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.
  10. Do, S. T., Nguyen, V. T., & Nguyen, N. H. (2022). Relationship networks between variation orders and claims/disputes causes on construction project performance and stakeholder performance. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management.

How to Cite

ALQassabi, M., Norhisham, S., Zakwan, M., AL-Shukaili, A., & AlKhawaldi, R. (2026). What Drives Variation Order Impact on Project Performance? PLS-SEM Evidence from Omani Fishery Port ProjectsT: The impact of Varetion Order. Journal of Applied Science, Engineering, Technology, and Education, 8(2), 300–320. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.asci4793

Copyright & license

Copyright (c) 2026 Masoud ALQassabi (Author)